Bruges was
added to our itinerary after we watched the Colin Farell – Ralph Fiennes movie
“In Bruges”. Apparently we weren’t the
only people who took Colin Firth’s summary of Bruges with a pinch of salt, and
decided that the town had a lot more to offer than his initial assessment
suggested. The town’s tourist map that
we picked up from the i-site had the following description in its 5 minutes
history section.
“2009 – The
movie “In Bruges” wins an award for best scenario(??). Colin
Farrell declares “If I grew up on a farm, and was retarded, Bruges would
impress me, but I didn’t, so it doesn’t”.
But the movie only attracts more tourists”. Apparently this wasn’t the first time Bruges
had been spoken about in less than flattering tones. In 1892 the popular book ‘Bruges la Morte’
describes the city as a dark, poor and ugly place. Locals weren’t too happy with this, but
tourists saw some romance in it, and numbers increase.
Bruges is a
beautifully preserved historic town centred around a large square (the Markt) which
has the Belfry on one side, the Provincial Palace on the other and a large
number of tourist restaurants on the other 2 sides. These restaurants all serve the “local
Belgium dishes” – Mussels and “Frites”, Stew and Croquettes – all good
summertime fare – and of course Belgian Beer.
Like Amsterdam,
Bruges is also a canal town and together with its striking architecture, makes
it a very pretty town – kinda like a fairy tale – which I think was how Ralph
Fiennes described it in the movie. The easiest
was to see Bruges is by walking it, and we enjoy doing our own walking tours,
so we headed off on our walking tour (a la local guide book – 10 Euros) mingling
with the horse drawn carriages and the many tourist groups, off the cruise
ships, following their leader who is holding a number on a stick – i.e. there
are a lot of groups, following a lot of leaders. This influx of tourists, turns the town into
absolute bedlam, while the cruisers are all marched at a grey pace from
interesting spot to interesting spot, to be filled up with facts, and at some
point food.
Bruges used
to be a port city, and in fact that was the source of its early wealth, as it
was the connecting point to Genoa and the Mediterranean trade. Around 1500, the port silted up, so it lost
its trade, but then somebody had the brilliant idea in 1907 of building another
port, hence the town of Zeebrugge….. (Sea Bruges) was created. The tourist map’s entry for the years 1600,
1700 and 1800 is “Bruges falls asleep”.
No other entry.
Part of our
walking tour on Friday brought us to the Pablo Picasso exhibition. We have been to (one of) the official Picasso
Museums on a previous trip, and were amazed at the range of work that he had
done, and what a versatile artist he was. He was also a prolific artist both in terms of
the quantity of art he produced, the relationships he established, both with contemporary
artists and desirable woman, as well as the offspring he produced. In fact, that becaome something of a highlight
of the exhibition, trying to work out who he was with, when, for how long, and
what off spring resulted. Most intriguing
was the name of one of his wives / partners / lovers – Olga Koklova. I’ve seen a couple of spellings of her name,
but the one above is my favourite.
Anyway, as I
say, Picasso was a prolific artist, and not all of it was good, so the order of
interesting exhibits we saw from Picasso and some of his contemporaries, was:
1.
The painting by Renoir
2.
Understanding (which isn’t possible) the
intricate relationships created by Picasso and his revolving door of female
companions (some of whom me with grizzly ends)
3.
The self-managing lawn mower mowing the lawn (badly)
in the courtyard outside the exhibition.
Funny, still no funky electro chicken dance then? Seeing Picasso's work must have been amazing, as well as becoming more familiar with his eclectic history, particularly in the women department.
ReplyDeleteDancing is for others, thank you.
ReplyDelete